Difference between revisions of "Jonsson models"

From Peano's Parlour
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "A model $\mathfrak B$ is ''J\'onsson'' if $|{\mathfrak B}|>\aleph_0$ and for every ${\mathfrak A}\prec {\mathfrak B}$, if $|{\mathfrak A}|=|{\mathfrak B}|$, then ${\mathfrak A}={...")
 
(Blanked the page)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A model $\mathfrak B$ is ''J\'onsson'' if $|{\mathfrak B}|>\aleph_0$ and for every ${\mathfrak A}\prec {\mathfrak B}$, if $|{\mathfrak A}|=|{\mathfrak B}|$, then ${\mathfrak A}={\mathfrak B}$.
 
  
Gaifman (1976) and Knight (1976) independently showed that there are J\'onsson models of $PA$.
 
 
J\'onsson models $M$ of $PA  of cardinality $\aleph_1$ are either $\aleph_1-like$ or are ''short'' i.e. there is an $a\in M$ such that the Skolem closure of $a$ is cofinal in $M$.  Each known J\'onsson model realizes uncountably many  complete types.
 
 
Kossak has asked: Is there an \olike\ J\'onsson model $M\models\PA$ such that $|\{\tp(a): a\in M\}|=\aleph_0$?
 
 
If $M\models\PA$ is  \olike\ and \rs\ then $|\{\tp(a): a\in M\}|=\aleph_0$, but $M$ is not J\'onsson. Therefore, another related question is: Is there a  '' weakly J\'onsson model'' $M\models \PA$, i.e. a recursively saturated model $M$ such that for  every recursively saturated $K\prec M$, if $|K|=|M|$, then $K=M$?
 
Some results related to this question are in Kossak, Roman, ''Four problems concerning recursively saturated models of arithmetic''. Special Issue: Models of arithmetic. Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 36 (1995), no. 4, 519–530.
 

Latest revision as of 11:45, 23 January 2013